Because I'm told that it will give me a bit more bhp, since I'm fitting CG13 cams, 1.3 fuel rail/injectors, straight through heat wrapped exhaust system, and am disconnecting the lambda sensor.
Also, I found the adaptor fpr the fuel rail on eBay, but not sure which one will fit? They have them for Skyines, Silvias, Pulsars, Sunnys, and SXs. Which one will fit my fuel rail?
i think you just need a generic nissan adaptor dan, and the CG ecu tends to over-ride any changes that you do to the fuelling and tries to keep it locked into closed loop, but with the lambda disconnected you "might" get some gains by altering the fuel pressure, its very much "trial and error" tho (it took me ages to configure some acceleration enrichment)
Lol how will it give you more bhp?? The same amount of fuel will be coming out the injectors, if you were running larger injectors then it would make sense
More hp can be got from smaller injectors by raising the pressure but you need more air also, putting bigger injectors in is the same thing it will just over fuel
Sounds massively unlikely though, sounds like those stupid resistors that people stick in the ect sensor to run the car rich
you have to question why my a/f/r,s went from 15+ :1 to 13:1 when i disconnected the coolant temp sensor on the dyno ? (blue trace at the bottom)
Right , I can tell you now all that hassle is for nothing, the stock one is up to the job for maintaining pressure at your power level I dont even have one in my st,its not a case of turn the pressure up and get more power
More hp can be got from smaller injectors by raising the pressure but you need more air also, putting bigger injectors in is the same thing it will just over fuel
i think you just need a generic nissan adaptor dan, and the CG ecu tends to over-ride any changes that you do to the fuelling and tries to keep it locked into closed loop, but with the lambda disconnected you "might" get some gains by altering the fuel pressure, its very much "trial and error" tho (it took me ages to configure some acceleration enrichment)
Sounds massively unlikely though, sounds like those stupid resistors that people stick in the ect sensor to run the car rich
I'm running near 200 bhp more than stock on my s14 and I haven't got a big fuel pressure reg the stock one is fine! The pressure of the fuel doesn't matter till your running big numbers and risking DET
It will just run the car rich, knacker the cat/s, make it slow as shyte and run like a bag monkey turn falling down stairs
:down: I was kind of hoping it would make a slight bit of difference. But I have a lot of free time on my hands next week, and want to fit my 1.3 fuel rail/injectors, and a set of CG13 cams as well, so I'll probably run with the stock FPR and the Walbro FPR, just to see if it makes any difference. If it doesn't make a difference, or if it's worse, I'll stick with the stock one. I don't want to have gone to the trouble of buying it, and not try it out :laugh:
Also, I am getting more air, because I've fitted a K&N performance air filter, and cold air feed (I'm planning on fitting a second cold air feed soon as well).
I can't find a generic adapter, but the adapter for the 200SX and Almera fuel rail look fairly similar, so they might work? And I noticed that I lost my flat spot during accelerating when I unplugged my lambda sensor once before, surely with the 4-1 manifold it will make a bit more of a difference? Especially with the 1.3 fuel rail, cams, etc...
Surely it's always worth a shot though, just to see if it does make a difference? If it doesn't, I can just go back to a stock FPR.
Would you slap me if I said I have a straight through exhaust system, which has been wrapped with heat proof exhaust wrap from the manifold to the backbox? Or at least it will do when I get the manifold fitted next week at some point. But I noticed a huge difference after removing the second cat, fitting an aftermarket backbox, K&N air filter, and cold air feed, so surely it won't make it too bad? I guess it's just a case of experimenting with it, seeing if it makes a difference, and returning to a stock FPR if it doesn't.
Cats are massively restrictive and you will notice a big difference, I'm running straight through 4" nur spec system 5" exit, apex t1 manifold, and apexi elbow I noticed a huge difference something like 35bhp
When you richen the mixture you should feel more torque later on but don't surprised if you bog down in the lower rpm
Possibly like I said I've never bothered with them, as I don't need one. But theoretically higher up the revs when the engine is sucking in more air it should give you a better mix closer to stoich for longer, but I could be wrongSo with my current and planned engine mods, I should notice more torque higher up the rev range after fitting the Walbro FPR? Because if so, I might just fit it anyway, and try and find what engine mods there are to give me a bit more low end torque (Y)
You want this for the fuel rail my friend.
http://www.fuelpumpsonline.co.uk/fu...a-micra-primera-skyline-200sx-s13s14-72-p.asp
Mate, you are an absolute diamond for finding this link for me. Top man! (Y)
No worries I only put in 'nissan micra fuel pressure adaptor' first link.
The injectors and fuel rail are the same.....
Lose some weight from the car best gain pound for pound!!
decent Exhuast
Decent cold air induction
Solid supension
Bigger brakes
Performance cams and then save up for a remap
Frank and everyone Is right it's just gonna override it in closed loop
Fit the fpr, you'll be convinced it's Done something but it's more just a mind thing mate
NA is hard way to go for power
Look at what Frank has to do and look at ebb dudes blog mate
Good luck
this is the one i used m8 , the pulsar one fit the micra fuel rail, just remember to put bit of grease on the o-ring before you push it on the fuel rail.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=370260781734&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT