Speed Camera costs drivers £750,000 in 2 months!
- Thread starter James
- Start date
J
Jim
Guest
RE: Speed Camera costs drivers £750,000 in 2 months!
makes me wonder then how much of an obstruction the road works posed in the first place if people didn't feel the need to slow down
makes me wonder then how much of an obstruction the road works posed in the first place if people didn't feel the need to slow down
Raceworx
IM BRINGING SEXY BACK
RE: Speed Camera costs drivers £750,000 in 2 months!
Its a farce! money making at its best! they have put them on the M4! and to do so have park on paths breaking the law! to "slow" drivers down! my arse! ill ell you how to slow drivers down! get more plice on the roads! theres nothing like having a copper following you to make you driver propperly!
Its like jeramy clarkson put it. the yorkshire ripper was caught on a routine traffic stop. if there were cameras about then he probly would have walked free!
Its a farce! money making at its best! they have put them on the M4! and to do so have park on paths breaking the law! to "slow" drivers down! my arse! ill ell you how to slow drivers down! get more plice on the roads! theres nothing like having a copper following you to make you driver propperly!
Its like jeramy clarkson put it. the yorkshire ripper was caught on a routine traffic stop. if there were cameras about then he probly would have walked free!
RE: Speed Camera costs drivers £750,000 in 2 months!
So true the thing is you have to remember for EVERY camera that does flash a motorist its purpose for being there has failed. I.e. to slow people so that camera has demonstrated 12,500 times in two months that it didnt work. You really dont need much more proof than that.
So true the thing is you have to remember for EVERY camera that does flash a motorist its purpose for being there has failed. I.e. to slow people so that camera has demonstrated 12,500 times in two months that it didnt work. You really dont need much more proof than that.