handeling
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
James
Chairman
Because it does.Mark said:
In fact i've just done another run tonight and beaten that. It now does it in [email protected] and 0-60 in 9.98s
O
ohc_turbo
Guest
is that g-tec pro? there not all that accurate really just give you a idea ie you get a time say 15sec then you change youre exhaust to a full jobby 2 1/4" and then you do another run and get a 14.8, then you know youve improved
my mates got a race tecnology ap 22, thats a good piece of kit, much more accurate for these type of private test track type of things.
anyway this thread is about going round corners and through chicanes
my mates got a race tecnology ap 22, thats a good piece of kit, much more accurate for these type of private test track type of things.
anyway this thread is about going round corners and through chicanes
O
ohc_turbo
Guest
im not sure about whether the g-tec is more favorable to a better time or less accurate meaning youve got a slower time, all i can remember is it aint all that accurate
have you put the correct weight of the car in? including the driver etc.etc.
that ap 22 has to have the co. of the car aswell, all these little bits makes it a tad more accurate.
have you put the correct weight of the car in? including the driver etc.etc.
that ap 22 has to have the co. of the car aswell, all these little bits makes it a tad more accurate.
ohc_turbo said:
Why? You dont need to. Its a simple measurment of acceleration over time. From this you can work out anything. With a flat road I find the G-tech surprisingly accurate. I have got a 14.4 at santapod and best on G-tech is around +0.2-0.3 seconds. Given normal roads dont have such good grip i would say thats faily good. The main problem with G-tech is with slow cars where acceleration is quite low. But even then surprisinly close if done right (within half a second)
Ed
O
ohc_turbo
Guest
g-tecs do come in diffrent modles dont they, you can pick them up for new for £40 but there is a g-tec pro which looks a bit better.
there a good tool to see if youre making any improvement on youre times though, the times are consistent
the weight is only used for a BHP Figure, you have to also put in the CO and the rolling resistance, does the g-tec has this function, the top of the range one might
there a good tool to see if youre making any improvement on youre times though, the times are consistent
the weight is only used for a BHP Figure, you have to also put in the CO and the rolling resistance, does the g-tec has this function, the top of the range one might
Alot of the G-tech times posted on here are not correct. For a start, the manual which comes with the G-tech says you're to do 5 runs. Ignore the worst two runs and average the other three. The fact pictures of G-tech readings are being stuck on here show this averaging calculation is being ignored!
Mark said:
but my cars shatpank apparently lol
but from what i gather, and im not gonna start a mass debate but i discussed it over msn with a few mates with g-techs who pointed out that apparently there useless under 100bhp as theres not enough power (thats a serious comment not a dig) to trigger the motion sensors properly :/
