Hello everyone,
I have spent some time on the forum, tons of good info! So you've convinced me to get a K11
Where I live I currently have a choice:
1- 1992 year with 130000Km, clutch changed and 1.3 engine
2- 2000 year with 120000Km, 1.0L Engine
the 1.0 is more expensive by 600€.
assuming the owners looked after them (oil changes and such) and the bodywork is in good nick (all else being equal), would it be better to get the 1.3 (it's cheaper, but moar power) and spend some cash on it since it's older, or get the 1.0 since it is more recent, even if more expensive?
I'm not a mechanic but I'm confident I can do minor maintenance and parts change.
Reading the forum it seems the 1.3 is preferred because of the 75bhp, but where I live (south of France) they are hard to come by. There are tons of 1.0 though.
Thanks!
I have spent some time on the forum, tons of good info! So you've convinced me to get a K11
Where I live I currently have a choice:
1- 1992 year with 130000Km, clutch changed and 1.3 engine
2- 2000 year with 120000Km, 1.0L Engine
the 1.0 is more expensive by 600€.
assuming the owners looked after them (oil changes and such) and the bodywork is in good nick (all else being equal), would it be better to get the 1.3 (it's cheaper, but moar power) and spend some cash on it since it's older, or get the 1.0 since it is more recent, even if more expensive?
I'm not a mechanic but I'm confident I can do minor maintenance and parts change.
Reading the forum it seems the 1.3 is preferred because of the 75bhp, but where I live (south of France) they are hard to come by. There are tons of 1.0 though.
Thanks!