Yes I do agree. Even with my three piece I noticed the suitability to certain scenarios.
I did try and put two and two together with why this was removed from robs car. Wheel Spinny action and abuse would not see the result Desired no doubt... Being that it would have no doubt been pushing the torque limit of this clutch setup as is.
I am sat here thinking that my power levels will never match that, but I don't like messing about. Would I be better doing what you plan on doing. If the factors are health of flywheel/cover vs street use vs power.
Health of flywheel/cover I am concerned about. Are we talking about huge amounts eaten in a friction plate lifetime? Would I be able to just drop an organic in its place after the ceramatallic has been worn through. I have a machined stock flywheel, so no special stuff there.
Suitable for street. Are we just looking at comfort? Ease of driving? Or are we talking about the more stop and starts which translates in belting it off the line at traffic lights for whatever reason you may do so and then repeating, would it heat the clutch up beyond safe and useable conditions or cause glazing. If it is because it jerks around a lot. I had a three paddle and preferred it to any day car I have had.
Power capabilities I am at the peak at the moment. I would be spending more to get thongs changed over.
So looking at it. Power I am good as we speak = 1 no. It might make the car jerk around, no bothered, unless I got street driving criteria wrong = 2 no. Flywheel health = no idea.
2 = no
1= maybe
Thinking about it. My other ceramatallic when I had it was not all that bad really.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
