fuel saving idea

CMF_Mike R

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:
thinking or re routing the intake pipe to the filter box so that the pipe sucks warm air from the back of the radiator instead of cold air from behind the headlamp .
Idea being that the warm air will force the engine to less fuel ( will it ?) .

Anybody else tried this or thinks its worth trying ?

thanks

Mike
 

CMF_Mike R

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:
I dont mind the loss of performance ? as I dont drive in rush hour traffic and my run to work covers 13 miles of motorway and A roads with very little stopping and starting . So i know if I make an improvement......
 

CMF_sikK11

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:
Not worth it with the fuel economy of a micra to begin with. I personally don't think you will notice a difference but get some cheap flexible pipe and do it. I could be wrong and for the sale of 15 bucks you will know for sure
 

CMF_mipcar

» CMF Member
Cooler/more dense air has always been considered the most efficient. Therfore hot/warm air less efficient. Less efficient> less economy to my way of thinking.
I don't know if the engine management will meter down the fuel that much to see a difference. There would be other factors as well like throttle position and engine revs.

Personally I'd just think that finding efficiencies in driving style would be as good as anything else.
 

CMF_frank2

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:
i aint putting thin oil in my engine, and bugger the granny driving :p
but yeh, engine oil in the g/box (like an austin rover)
max tyrewall pressures
1/2 speed alternator
11.5:1 C/R
retarded, long duration inlet cam (like a prius)
4 kg flywheel
lpg
all FTW :)
 

CMF_frank2

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:

nah, i dont buy that personally (he,s trying to sell a device eh :p)
volumetric efficiency is higher with wider throttle openings (for example diesels have no throttle eh, ie, less pumping losses)
and your car will give the best milage at about 2k rpm in top gear at low throttle (which contradicts most of what he said)
 

CMF_Mike R

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:
interesting ....it monitors the MAF and TPS and warns you that your not in the best region of the engines fuel comsumtion .... by the way its a

http://www.microchip.com/wwwproducts/Devices.aspx?dDocName=en010114

thing is , its difficult to match road conditions to what an engine wants . If you could run an engine at one speed all the time , it could be tuned to max eff , min noise , min vibration etc ....

I am going to try the WAI idea anyway ...

one big area that seems to be worth trying is a smooth underside to the car ?????? but that beam axle at the back !!!!

as for cycling ..after running a volvo , the micas MPG is magical !!!!! but cycling is not !!
 

CMF_mipcar

» CMF Member
frank2 WROTE:
volumetric efficiency is higher with wider throttle openings (for example diesels have no throttle eh, ie, less pumping losses).

I'm not sure that is entirely correct Frank.If you have a wider throttle opening but low vacuum due to low revs you reduce your gas flow speed (at least in a carby engine). Less gas velocity means less efficiency.

Same with older diesels as was on my boat,If I opened the power lever, I wont call it a throttle (although technically you are still throttling the engine up or down) but it was at high load and low prop speed as in powering up with a fouled hull or over-pitched propeller then the engine 'over fuels' and goes smokey as it's feeding in more fuel then it is drawing in air so your mixture goes out.
 

CMF_frank2

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:
mipcar WROTE:

I'm not sure that is entirely correct Frank.If you have a wider throttle opening but low vacuum due to low revs you reduce your gas flow speed (at least in a carby engine). Less gas velocity means less efficiency.

hmm, what i mean is that diesels are always at wide open throttle eh (they have no butterfly) so they have lower pumping losses.
whereas when we are cuising at 2k our throttle is barely open and the high vacuum in the inlet mani means the cylinder is only partly filled with air (ie, a very low/ineficient dynamic compression ratio, far short of the intended 9.5:1)
 

CMF_Bishop

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:
Micra is already bloody good for era, helped by seriously low weight (anything more modern weighs twice as much now, and a well set up fuel system that does things like fuel cut on the overrun.

The fuel cut impresses me, cause I live up a mt road, one of the first things I noticed was mine uses near nothing fuel heading down the mt, though it's balanced off by a heavy foot coming home up it. (LOL)

Seriously though the L/100km mine gets has raised some brows from friends.

Mind you, some things help, 155 tyres have very little rolling resistance, so keep a set of those around if you want to save $, also stay away from ethanol fuels, and learn to drive it right, that alone can save heaps of fuel.
 

CMF_Mike R

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:
should help that I have just found out my tyre pressure gauge was reading 5 psi high and have now corrected for it .

and chucked out half of my toolkit from the boot which has saved a lot of weight.

just got 44mpg on the last tankfull
 

CMF_Bishop

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:
The accuracy of a pressure gauge is not 'that' important, I tell people that all the time, you should set by feel and tyre wear patterns, purely setting via numbers is vague at best.

 

CMF_Mike R

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:
interestingly I just did 200 miles at 70mph and got 40mpg ( London to Liverpool) ..is this good for a micra ? ... I used to do the same run in a volvo240 and got 30mpg !!
 

CMF_Greo

» CMF Member
Member since:
Posts:
I average 41MPG at the moment and thats city driving.
Check spark plugs, use a throttle body cleaner spray and try an injector clean.

This should clean out any sludge that might be limiting the fuel system.
 
Back
Top