i,m shocked paul
catch cans do bugger all J, they,re just a bit of bling really, how many factory turbo,d cars have you seen with one ? i hav,nt run one for years and i know for a fact that if i start venting oil then there,s a fault/issue somewhere
http://oilcatchcan.com/
the principle of the mechanism itself has a purpose:
reduce oil vapours from re-entering the intake,
prevent contamination of all the components thoughout the intake plumbing,
reduce risk of disturbing the combustion mixture under high loads (from either contaminated sensor causing miscalculated AFR or from a small pool of oil entering the chamber),
reduce risk of any abnormal combustion such as knocking or lean-out or too rich,
reduce chances of ECU "pulling back" the mapping (and power) to protect itself when it detects knock IF it has such feature,
reduce risk of lean-out damage or lose power from over-rich AFR if there's no knock sensor
the system basically ensures consistant reliable power so the tuner can push the most out of an engine safely.
when the products are poor quality replicas, poorly designed to not perform well or was installed incorrectly, then it's called bling.
why do motorsport use them while normal domestic NA/turbo cars don't? = cost & ease of maintenance & emissions standards.
on
factory cars they simply return the oily PCV vapour straight back into the inlet mani vacuum (after the sensors & throttle) to be burnt.
it's cheap & easy, the user won't have to periodically empty any oil canister for ease of maintenance and oil vapour ain't leaking onto the floor or air.
If there was any chance of the oil causing abnormal combustion, the ECU map would've either been mapped with alot of safety margin (at the cost of performance) and/or the knock sensor would've caused the ECU to pull back the map briefly (at the cost of performance) to save it.
motorsport tuners on the other hand want to tune the MAX performance from that engine setup as close as possible to the edge of failure only to last a specific
mean-time-between-failures to have the best advantage to go fastest & win, and don't care for the environment or ease of maintenance with such resources.
chalk & cheese difference in goals & requirements.
another way to see it is like the computer industry.
a standard domestic PC CPU/GPU is hardly running at it's maximum theoretical limit cos the manufacturer intentionally dulled it down within a safety margin to operate reliably under a wide range of conditions & tasks.
custom PC overclockers in comparison are like engine tuners, running the chip under specific conditions (low temps) for lower inteference and manage heat so they can ramp up the voltages and clock speed closer to the edge of failure just to acheive a faster but reasonably reliable clock speed for a specific task.
Oh and what does CBA stand for?
can't be arsed